Celebrating 25 years of IOAP and the launch of Land Systems:
be among the first 25 submissions & get your paper for free.
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/ls-2026-10
https://doi.org/10.5194/ls-2026-10
12 Oct 2026
 | 12 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal LS.

Conditions for an effective EU regulation on deforestation-free products: Where will it likely reduce deforestation?

Johanna Coenen, U. Martin Persson, Arild Angelsen, Mairon Bastos Lima, Laila Berning, Thomas Kastner, Dario Schulz, Metodi Sotirov, and Sven Wunder

Abstract. In 2023, the European Union (EU) adopted the Regulation on Deforestation-free Products (EUDR) to curb deforestation and forest degradation linked to its agricultural and wood trade. While existing research has outlined how the regulation is expected to work when implemented from 2027, we still have a weak understanding of how these mechanisms are likely to play out across different country and commodity contexts. This study focuses on the conditions under which different outcomes emerge, encompassing both intended impacts and potential spillover effects. We highlight that the regulation is likely to produce heterogeneous, context-dependent outcomes in reducing future deforestation across commodities and countries, with EU market shares and associated deforestation embodied in EU trade being key conditions. Evaluated in absolute terms, the EUDR may not substantially reduce global deforestation or emissions, but it could be effective in certain contexts. Our results suggest that high EU market shares (e.g., cocoa, coffee) offer leverage, while low market shares (e.g., soy, palm oil) increase risks of market segregation and negative spillovers. The EUDR’s most significant source of leverage likely stems from its broader influence on forest and supply-chain governance among multinational companies and non-EU countries. Achieving this wider impact requires coordinated collaboration with both producer and other consumer countries.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Johanna Coenen, U. Martin Persson, Arild Angelsen, Mairon Bastos Lima, Laila Berning, Thomas Kastner, Dario Schulz, Metodi Sotirov, and Sven Wunder

Status: open (until 23 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on ls-2026-10', Paulina Flores Martinez, 21 Oct 2026 reply
Johanna Coenen, U. Martin Persson, Arild Angelsen, Mairon Bastos Lima, Laila Berning, Thomas Kastner, Dario Schulz, Metodi Sotirov, and Sven Wunder
Johanna Coenen, U. Martin Persson, Arild Angelsen, Mairon Bastos Lima, Laila Berning, Thomas Kastner, Dario Schulz, Metodi Sotirov, and Sven Wunder
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
This study examines the conditions under which the EU Deforestation Regulation is likely to reduce deforestation and why its impacts are likely to differ across countries and products. We find that the regulation is likely to be most effective where the EU is a major buyer, such as for cocoa and coffee. Where its market influence is smaller, such as for soy and palm oil, benefits may be limited and trade could shift to other markets.
Share